Home DADE
New Blog Posts: Merging Reports - Part 1 and Part 2

Sorting with DADE

edited January 2004 in DADE
Hi. I need to create a report in DADE (pipelines inside rtm file) and I am
having a problem when trying to sort data.
I have one "master" pipeline and some "detail" pipelines connected to the
master (details has on1 pointer to the master's primary key). The report
prints fine as long as I don't put any sorting on any of the pipelines.
I've traced the generated sql and for each pipeline it generates the
following:

select HeaderTable.field1, HeaderTable.field2, HeaderTable.field3
from headertable
inner join DetailTable1 on HeaderTable.PrimaryKey =
DetailTable1.PointerToHeaderKey
Order By HeaderTable.HeaderCode, DetailTable1.DetailCode

select DetailTable1.Field1, DetailTable1.field2, DetailTable1.field3
from HeaderTable
inner join DetailTable2 on HeaderTable.PrimaryKey =
DetailTable2.PointerToHeaderKey
Order By HeaderTable.HeaderCode, DetailTable2.DetailCode

and so forth...

results with NO sorting:
Header 1
Table 1
DetailTable1.fld1 ###
DetailTable1.fld2 ###
Table 2
DetailTable2.fld3 ###
DetailTable2.fld4 ###
Table 3
DetailTable3.fld5 ###
DetailTable3.fld6 ###

Adding sorting to header pipeline:
Header 1
Table 1
DetailTable1.fld1 ###
DetailTable1.fld2 ###
DetailTable2.fld3 ###
DetailTable2.fld4 ###
DetailTable3.fld5 ###
DetailTable3.fld6 ###
Table 2
Table 3

In short, how can I use "sorting" in DADE??? Help please.
Thanks
Gus.

Comments

  • edited January 2004

    -------------------------------------------
    Tech Tip: Database Collation and Linking
    -------------------------------------------

    Overview
    ---------

    Linking DataViews in the ReportBuilder Data workspace (DADE), requires that
    the detail data be sorted by the linking fields. When DataViews are linked,
    DADE generates special linking SQL for the detail DataView. The linking SQL
    (Magic SQL) can be viewed by positioning the mouse over the DataView window
    and pressing Ctrl + Left Mouse button. The results of the Magic SQL query
    can be viewed by pressing Shift + Left Mouse button.

    ReportBuilder's DataPipeline architecture includes support for linked data
    traversal. Whenver the record position of the master data changes, the
    traversal logic compares the master and detail field link values and then
    determines where to locate the record position for the related detail data.
    The linking logic will only work properly if the Database engine's collation
    of the detail query result set is in sync with ReportBuilder's internaly
    field link comparison logic.

    Typically the database engine can be configured to use various language
    drivers which control the collation order used to sort query results.

    ReportBuilder contains the two properties that can be configured to control
    the internal field link comparison:

    Designer.DataSettings.CollationType (ctASCII or ctANSI) and
    Designer.DataSettings.IsCaseSensitive (True/False). Using these properties
    results in one of 4 Delphi string comparison routines being used to compare
    string data:

    1. ctASCII

    a. IsCaseSensitive = True --> CompareStr
    b. IsCaseSensitive = False --> CompareText

    2. ctANSI

    a. IsCaseSensitive = True --> AnsiCompareStr
    b. IsCaseSensitive = False -->AnsiCompareText


    The current values for the Designer.DataSettings are used to create new
    DataViews. The DataView's internal TdaSQL object saves the
    Designer.DataSettings as part of the dataview's definition. The
    CollationType and IsCaseSensitive values are assigned any DataPipeline field
    links created for the dataview.


    Designer.DataSettings -----> QueryDataView
    |_ SQL object
    |_ DataPipeline.Links[]: TppMasterFieldLInk


    Therefore to modify the DataSettings once a query has been modified requires
    that the SQL object and the DataPipeline.Links be updated.





    --
    Nard Moseley
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com

    Best regards,

    Nard Moseley
    Digital Metaphors
    www.digital-metaphors.com
This discussion has been closed.