Home General
New Blog Posts: Merging Reports - Part 1 and Part 2

Stretch n' Stuff

edited January 2002 in General

I have 14 memo fields in the detail band. I'm trying to display 7 fields
from one record then 7 from another below. I want the memo fields in the
first record to stretch downwards but I don't want the font to suddenly get
smaller when it does. Also, I want the second record to move down the page
so that the first records fields don't overlap.

A few suggestions?

Regards,

Kieron

--
--
Kieron G Smith
Work: work@kieronsmith.co.uk
And Play: play@kieronsmith.co.uk

Comments

  • edited January 2002

    The overlapping is no longer a problem.

    I just want to stop the font decreasing in size when the memo field is
    stretched. Can this be done? If not, why not? It just makes my report
    look messy with two different sizes of font...

    Regards,

    Kieron

  • edited January 2002
    Hi Kieron...

    Though it seems it uses two font sizes, this is not really the case.
    ReportBuilder occasionaly changes the size on-screen but will print it
    correctly. Try it out :) I'm not 100% sure about the details, but it has
    something to do with ReportBuilder being optimized for printing instead of
    on-screen viewing.

    Hope that helps, Marco..
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Marco Heine
    QUMAS
    Enterprise Compliance Management
    Visit our Website: www.qumas.com

  • edited January 2002

    Yeah, cheers Marco...I see you're right.

    Here's the problem though...

    My memo fields must all be set to Stretch. The second row of memo fields
    need to shift downwards(as a whole) to avoid the first row overlapping. I
    can't set Stretch and Shift With parent at the same time. Shift Relative To
    is not useful as I can't reference the entire first line of memo fields.

    Any ideas?

    Kieron



  • edited January 2002
    Hi Kieron...

    Yupp :) Just put each row of Memo Fields into a Region. Then make the second
    Region shift relative to the first. I think that should solve your problem
    :)

    Cheers, Marco...
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    Marco Heine
    QUMAS
    Enterprise Compliance Management
    Visit our Website: www.qumas.com

  • edited January 2002
    The reason your preview won't match your printed output is that we have two
    choices when we create a preview - compose for the screen, or compose for
    the printer. Most programs such as MS Word compose to the screen when they
    create a preview. This makes for attractive previews but they tend to be
    inaccurate. And it means that they then compose again for the printer when
    you print the document. Most of the time things will print effectively
    similar to the preview, but we have seen many times when the printed output
    was different - a word wrapped to the next line, or some such problem. If
    you use a program meant for accurate page layout, such as PageMaker, you
    will notice that the Page Setup dialog asks you for which printer you wish
    to compose. When PageMaker displays a page, it may not look exactly how you
    think it should, but you do get a preview where the element placement is
    guaranteed to match the printed output's element placement. We have chosen
    to follow this second model.

    Note that when we say element placement, we are referring to X and Y
    placement and not height and width. While the X and Y placement of our
    previews will be accurate, the height and width of text elements may vary
    based on zoom percentage. This is a normal artifact of composing for the
    printer and not for the screen.

    Your preview can not match your printed output. It will differ in one of two
    ways:

    1- It can look good on the screen, but items on the page may not display in
    the same location they will when printed.
    or
    2- It can be less attractive, but items will display on the preview exactly
    where they will when printed.

    We give you the second because it is more accurate and more reliable. Not to
    mention more in keeping with professional page layout products.


    --
    Cheers,

    Jim Bennett
    Digital Metaphors


This discussion has been closed.