rtl90.exe error with richedit field

rbuser

I receive a Access violation in rtl90.bpl when I attempt to assign a memo
field to a twwDBRichEdit.
If I use a twwDBMemo, it accepts it and prints it along with all the format
codes but without an error.
If I further attempt anything else with the twwDBRichEdit (moving, resizing)
it continues to give the access error, sometimes shuts down Delphi
completely, and sometimes locks out the report so I cannot access it at all
(giving an Access violation - rtl90.bpl).

Using Delphi 2005 vers 3 with ReportBuilder vers 9.02, Woll2Woll 4000 and
Advantage Data System db.

The field is an ADS memo field which is edited with twwDBRichEdit.

I have read the "RichText not shown on report (7/19/2005)" and do not know
if/how this might apply to this situation.

nicocizik

Hi,

Are you able to successfully assign a memo field to the built-in
TppDBRichText component? If so, you may want to contact the InfoPower
support and see if this is a known issue with their component.

--
Regards,

Nico Cizik
Digital Metaphors
http://www.digital-metaphors.com

rbuser

If I place a TppDBMemo field on my RB report form, it allows me to assign a
db memo field to it.
If I place a TppDBRichEdit field on my RB report form, it gives an Access
error in rtl90.dbl as soon as I assign a db memo field to it.
If I take an existing working RB report (originally created in D6/RB7) with
a db memo field already assigned to a TppDBRichEdit, recompile it in D2005,
RB9.02 it executes properly. However, when I display that report using
DB2005/RB9, at design time, as soon as I click on the TbbDBRichEdit field on
the RB form, the system spits out a "Access violation at address 40005C4B
in module 'rtl90.bpl'. Read of address 89B0E987." error message. After,
that clicking on other fields are not reflected in the Object Inspector.

nicocizik

Hi,

Thanks for the info, we have not seen this behavior before. If possible,
please send a small example of this that I can run on my machine in .zip
format to support@digital-metaphors.com and I'll take a look at it for you.

--
Regards,

Nico Cizik
Digital Metaphors
http://www.digital-metaphors.com