Home General
New Blog Posts: Merging Reports - Part 1 and Part 2

RB and RTF

edited July 2010 in General
Hello,


I'm using RB 11.08.
I put a TppDBRichText on a report, the text is correctly rendered but i
don't get any images, there are no errors, images are simply ignored !
Why ?

Original RTF content is theorically RichEdit 2.0 (commin from a
cxDBRichEdit).

RTF content can be copy/paste in both ways between the cxDBRichEdit
control and Wordpad without problem...

Thanks

Best regards

Comments

  • edited July 2010
    Hi Frédéric,

    Take a look at the following article on how the RichText components work in
    ReportBuilder and the options to enhanced their capabilities.

    http://www.digital-metaphors.com/rbWiki/RCL/RichText/RB_RichText

    --
    Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com

    Best Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com
  • edited July 2010
    Hello,


    Thanks for your answer !

    I don't have any of the 3rd party components named in the document...

    I tried something similar to the ww example (ppWWRichEd.pas) with the
    TcxDBRichEdit component, but I get compilation error :

    [DCC Error] ppcxRichEd.pas(107): E2010 Incompatible types:
    'TppCustomRichEditClass' and 'Class reference'

    I replaced the TwwDBRichEdit class by the TcxDBRichEdit component.
    I guess the example is not up to date because it should at least compile ?

    Can you give me a tip ?

    Thanks.

    Regards.

    Frédéric



    Le 22/07/2010 18:00, Nico Cizik (Digital Metaphors) a écrit :
  • edited July 2010
    Hi Frédéric,

    The Infopower addon for ReportBuilder is meant to be used only with the
    InfoPower RichEdit control, not DBExpress. We have not tested the use of
    the TcxDBRichEdit with ReportBuilder.

    --
    Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com

    Best Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com
This discussion has been closed.