Difference 5.55 and 6.01
Hello!
I detected a little but ugly difference between RB5.55 and RB6.01. (D5
German, W2K german)
I have a summery-Group with a fix-position at 220 (mm) with a heigth of
64,294 mm. The footer-band has a height of 30 mm (this is much too
height).
With Rb5.55 the summery is on the same page at this position.
With Rb6.01 the summery is on the top of the next page.
It looks like that the footer-band in RB5.55 was dynamic-height (i
can't change this on my own) and in RB6.01 it is fixed-heigt.
Now I have to change all the reports (mostly invoices) for every
customer
any Ideas to make this easier for me...
Gruß aus den Bergen
Günter
I detected a little but ugly difference between RB5.55 and RB6.01. (D5
German, W2K german)
I have a summery-Group with a fix-position at 220 (mm) with a heigth of
64,294 mm. The footer-band has a height of 30 mm (this is much too
height).
With Rb5.55 the summery is on the same page at this position.
With Rb6.01 the summery is on the top of the next page.
It looks like that the footer-band in RB5.55 was dynamic-height (i
can't change this on my own) and in RB6.01 it is fixed-heigt.
Now I have to change all the reports (mostly invoices) for every
customer
any Ideas to make this easier for me...
Gruß aus den Bergen
Günter
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The footer band has always been static height.
Not sure what the difference is that you are seeing. There were some
inaccurate unit conversion issues in the prior release, perhaps this was
working in your favor.
Best regards,
Nard Moseley
Digital Metaphors
www.digital-metaphors.com