Home General
New Blog Posts: Merging Reports - Part 1 and Part 2

Exception with RB11.02

edited January 2009 in General
Hi,

I have a access violation on close application. This problem is only with
RB11.02, if I reinstall RB11.01 all is ok.

J-Pierre

---------------------------
Notification des exceptions du débogueur
---------------------------
Le projet SM.exe a déclenché la classe d'exception $C0000005 avec le message
'access violation at 0x008d0bd5: read of address 0xffffffec'.
---------------------------
Arrêter Continuer Aide
---------------------------

CPU -

TppTBXNexus.Broadcast:
008D0B90 55 push ebp
008D0B91 8BEC mov ebp,esp
008D0B93 83C4EC add esp,-$14
008D0B96 53 push ebx
008D0B97 56 push esi
008D0B98 57 push edi
008D0B99 894DFC mov [ebp-$04],ecx
008D0B9C 8BF0 mov esi,eax
008D0B9E 8B4604 mov eax,[esi+$04]
008D0BA1 8B4008 mov eax,[eax+$08]
008D0BA4 85C0 test eax,eax
008D0BA6 7E34 jle $008d0bdc
008D0BA8 8955EC mov [ebp-$14],edx
008D0BAB 8B55FC mov edx,[ebp-$04]
008D0BAE 8955F0 mov [ebp-$10],edx
008D0BB1 8B5508 mov edx,[ebp+$08]
008D0BB4 8955F4 mov [ebp-$0c],edx
008D0BB7 33D2 xor edx,edx
008D0BB9 8955F8 mov [ebp-$08],edx
008D0BBC 8BD8 mov ebx,eax
008D0BBE 4B dec ebx
008D0BBF 85DB test ebx,ebx
008D0BC1 7C19 jl $008d0bdc
008D0BC3 43 inc ebx
008D0BC4 33FF xor edi,edi
008D0BC6 8BD7 mov edx,edi
008D0BC8 8B4604 mov eax,[esi+$04]
008D0BCB E86421B5FF call TList.Get
008D0BD0 8D55EC lea edx,[ebp-$14]
008D0BD3 8B08 mov ecx,[eax]
008D0BD5 FF51EC call dword ptr [ecx-$14] // *************
Exception here *************

Comments

  • edited January 2009
    Hi J-Pierre,

    Try re-downloading RB 11.02 and re-installing. We recently uploaded a new
    build that may solve the issue.

    If this does not fix the issue, please send a simple example in .zip format
    to support@digital-metaphors.com and I'll take a look at it for you.

    --
    Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com

    Best Regards,

    Nico Cizik
    Digital Metaphors
    http://www.digital-metaphors.com
This discussion has been closed.