MasterFieldLinks
Hi.
I don't know if this is intended behaviour or not, but this is the
situation.
Two dbPipelines with a Master-Detail relationship defined.
Both pipelines are assigned to two Dbisam Queries that pulls data from two
Physical Dbisam tables where the Keyfields (for both tables) used in the
"FieldLinks" are Descending.
I this case the Master-Detail relationship fails.
If the Dbisam Tables are Altered and the Desc for the Keyfields removed,
Master-Detail works as expected.
Petter Topp
D 2010
Dbisam 4.30
RB 12.03
I don't know if this is intended behaviour or not, but this is the
situation.
Two dbPipelines with a Master-Detail relationship defined.
Both pipelines are assigned to two Dbisam Queries that pulls data from two
Physical Dbisam tables where the Keyfields (for both tables) used in the
"FieldLinks" are Descending.
I this case the Master-Detail relationship fails.
If the Dbisam Tables are Altered and the Desc for the Keyfields removed,
Master-Detail works as expected.
Petter Topp
D 2010
Dbisam 4.30
RB 12.03
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
If the detail data is sorted in descending order, then the
MasterFieldLink.DetailSortOrder should be set to soDescending.
-
Nard Moseley
Digital Metaphors
www.digital-metaphors.com
Best regards,
Nard Moseley
Digital Metaphors
www.digital-metaphors.com